The quality gate for AI-generated content
AI is writing your content. Nobody is checking it before it ships.
AI tools generate content at scale, but 80% of it ranks nowhere and gets zero AI citations. Nobody checks it before it ships. Dokeo is the gate that does.SEO + AEO + GEO in one deterministic pass, 34 checks in 5ms. Same input, same verdict. Treat content like code: if the gate fails, the PR doesn't merge.
Deterministic - including against your own corpus
100 free scans / month · no credit card · same gate as production
398 scans through the gate
Live gate
Run the gate on a real draft
Same gate as production. No signup. Paste any post and get a verdict - SEO + AEO + GEO.
The loop
Score it. Fix it. Ship it.
Then do it again. Better.
The compounding edge is not more content - it is a gate that stops weak pieces before they burn budget and brand.
Draft
Human or LLM - the gate does not care who wrote it. Paste, PR, webhook, or CLI.
Gate
SEO + AEO + GEO in one pass, including your corpus. A deterministic five-severity verdict.
Ship
Only what passed goes live. Optional GitHub Action blocks the PR the way a failing test does.
Prove
Watch ties each scan to real AI citations so the loop gets smarter over time. (Pro+)
Alternatives
A gate, not another writer
Surfer and Clearscope help you write. AI monitors track after publish. Dokeo is the pre-publish quality gate between drafting and ship.
| Job | Surfer / Clearscope | AI monitors | Dokeo |
|---|---|---|---|
| When | While writing | After publish | Before publish |
| Output | Keyword grade | Citation dashboard | 5-severity verdict |
| AEO + GEO | Partial | Track only | Scored in-gate |
| Your corpus | - | - | Near-dup / cannibal |
| CI / webhook | - | - | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
How is this different from Surfer or Clearscope?
Different job. They help you write. Dokeo decides if the finished piece ships - SEO + AEO + GEO, corpus-aware, a five-severity verdict. Many teams draft in Surfer, then gate with Dokeo.
Why not just ask ChatGPT to review my content?
DIY LLM review is fine for editorial feedback. It is not a stable ship/no-ship contract. Dokeo is deterministic: same input, same verdict, safe for CI.
Does Dokeo use AI in its scoring?
No. Scoring is deterministic (structure, formulas, parsers). Optional AI rewrites on Growth+ are a separate step - the gate always shows why a check failed.
What happens on Fail?
Inline issues on the web. In CI, Fail can block the PR. Configure pass, warn, or block to match your pipeline.
Can I try without signing up?
Yes - scan on this page free. Free accounts get 100 scans/month with history and batch. No credit card.
The quality gate for AI-generated content
Let's get
to work.
Start gating content today. 100 free scans a month - or book a walkthrough for your pipeline.